AMD Ryzen 9 7900X: What Reddit Really Thinks

Not enough to lose sleep over. Definitely not enough to sell it and buy a 7800x3d. 6-10 percent at 1440p in most tests I've seen online.

AMD totally misread the market pricing these. They decide to be DDR5 only, and then the motherboard pricing is insane. Those two factors make the 7600/7700x basically impossible to recommend due to the upfront cost.

Wow, it's cheaper than the 7800x3D. I didn't realize gamers skew the market this hard.

Motherboard producers are scalping people for the mobos they didn't sell throughout AM4's life. AM5 is announced to last the same amount of years.

It seems everyone saw this coming a mile away except AMD.

If you don't play competitive games, x3d isn't a super high priority. It's still great for improving 1% lows but not necessary if the budget is too high. You could go 7900x and your gameplay would still be fine.

You still have an excellent CPU. Nothing to be sad about.

I am building a PC for work and of course gaming. I just bought this chip today when I noticed it on sale. My logic being: The 7800X3D is $200-$300 more expensive, and my plans to utilize this for more than just gaming mean I could use the extra cores at the cost of gaming performance.

If you need extra cores you're missing out on very little in exchange for better productivity. If you don't need the cores you're still missing out on very little. Non X3D is very RAM sensitive, so make sure you've optimized your RAM timings with the updated bios and you'll be fine.

Personally I'd say you got the better CPU. Although the 7800X3D performs a bit better in a lot of games it's the kind of difference you'll probably only notice in benchmarks and not when you're actually playing. Also, if you like to multitask to any extent then you're better off with the extra cores, especially as new games increasingly use more.

Do NOT set a manual overclock, that's been a faux pas on AMD since Zen 2 with Precision Boost Overdrive, and even more so with Curve Optimizer. Reset everything to stock and read up on PBO and CO. I got a good amount more performance from my 7950X, including single core boost of 6GHz — all while drawing less power than stock.

It performs like a monster, but at the cost of serious power draw. It's also a stupid choice for gamers, since most games are going to be GPU bottlenecked with these CPUs. These are productivity CPUs, and are ridiculously overpowered for gaming.

I own both the 7900x and 7700x. There's no difference in gaming or every day use (YouTube, Netflix, MS Office, Zoom, etc.).

Improved performance in what? Gaming? No. Video editing? Yes.

I was just looking at this exact same choice, and ended up settling on the 9900x, mainly because of the bundle deal I was able to get. CPU, motherboard, and 32 GB for $500 at Micro Center was too good to pass up.

The 7800x3D is the best gaming CPU, but the 7700x and 7900x, both comparable in gaming performance, are still more than good enough to game at whatever resolution you want. At 1080p and 1440p, the difference between 200fps and 250fps is meaningless to most people.

I got a 7900x and I love it. Value-wise since I got it with the microcenter combo bundle it's way better than anything I could've built with the 7800x3d. My plan is to swap it with a 9800x3d or whatever the next generation is and do a mini itx build with the 7900x.

The 7900X is a great chip still and has performance benefits over the 7800X3D in non-game tasks. So if you use your system for any dev or video, or production work you should be happy — if all you do is game, you will not worry either as it's still a great gaming CPU.

For gaming, there might be better options. But it's truly a beast for production work.

Not worth losing sleep over. The 7900x is a good CPU, especially with a 4070. Performance will likely be the same, maybe the difference would be on minimums. However, if you had a 4090, I would have advised you to sell the 7900x and get a 7800x3d.

If you're willing to take the performance hit in gaming, take the performance bump in multi-threaded apps, and wait a bit, the 7900X3D has hit this price point before.

7900X is more than enough for 99% of uses. I'd go with that one.

I prefer CPUs that allow me multitasking. Gaming CPUs are a waste and overpriced. Paying for a CPU that does 1 thing well, and not even well enough to notice a difference, is a waste. You can't tell the difference between 300 fps and 330 fps. Your choice was fine.

The 7800x3d is somewhat better for gaming, but the 7900x is still a monster gaming CPU. If you're outside the return window, don't worry about it.

Curve Optimizer lets you lower the temperature while at the same time maybe getting 50MHz more.

7700x is better (and cheaper) because it's one 8 core CCD than twin six cores. Most games don't even use 6 cores half of the time, much less all 12 lmao.

AMD has stopped producing the 7XXX series, the 9XXX series are meh, and Intel's Arrow Lake is just a power reduction with mainly matching or regressing from Rocket Lake gaming performance — creates the perfect storm to boost the 7800X3D's prices.

I used a 7900x before my 9950x3D and it's the best value out of the chips listed. I used it for gaming and productivity too, and didn't really have any complaints about performance. In most non CPU intensive titles you'll get well over 100fps.

The 7900X with Eco mode turned on is a 7900. The 7900 manually overclocked is a 7900X. They're basically the same thing. I just hope you aren't buying this primarily as a gaming CPU — a TON of people buy the 7900/7900X for gaming thinking it's better than something in the Ryzen 7 series, and in fact it's rarely better.

Avoid the Gigabyte boards like the plague. I have had nothing but issues with mine since I got it.

Don't get the Aorus Master — I've had nothing but boot problems, memory problems, and BIOS resets. The board's junk.

If you use your PC strictly for gaming, the 7800X3D is the one to go for. However, for other content creation and productivity, the 7900X is more reliable. You're basically getting the most bang for your buck with the 7900X — you can just do more with it.

When I said 'for gaming there might be better options', we're talking about some differences like 150+ vs 170+ fps in AAA titles. The 7900x is a beast for gaming too. Just not as good as the x3d models. But every other task which can max out multiple cores/threads will benefit from them on the 7900x. Also multi-tasking.

7900x is a good chip but only if you feel like you'd benefit from the extra cores/threads.

For gaming, dual-CCD chips (12/16 cores) are cost-ineffective. 7900X is no better in games than 7700X, and loses to 7800X3D and 7600X3D in every game that I've seen tested. Even 7600X, which is literally 7900X chopped in half, is only marginally slower.

I'm on r9 7900 (non-x), more than enough for anything mentioned — 1440p 165fps gaming, heavy music production, stable diffusion, some local GPTs, coding, done some video editing on it too. It's 12 cores / 24 threads, and holds boost very well.

I was in the same boat, went with the 7900x in the end and I'd do it again if given the choice.

Temps are great with the phantom spirit (generally in the 45-50 range while idle, at most 75 while I am pushing it). I mostly use it for productivity with a bit of gaming and yes, 12 cores are enough for me (blender, simulation programming in unity, general programming and games). I undervolted it and adjusted the curve using PBO.

PBO gets the 7900 to 7900x performance (or at least so close you wouldn't care) and by the time you add a simple -30 all core undervolt you're looking at about 16/17% above stock in r23. Been solid in gaming and very impressive for my production workloads.

Factory clocks are already quite high on 7900x, meaning if you push them higher you get very little gains for quite a bit more heat and power usage. Turn on PBO if you want but honestly factory clocks are where I'd leave it.

Definitely not worth overclocking for all the heat to get an extra 2-3 FPS in Cyberpunk.

For gaming and streaming, I absolutely love the multitasking freedom 12 cores give me while streaming and gaming. The temps on full loads are below 60 with a 360mm AIO at 5500MHz. I love it.