Intel Intel Core i9-9980XE
CPUs

Intel

Intel Core i9-9980XE: What Real Users Think on Reddit

Mar 2026

Last Analyzed

4/10

Overall Rating

7

Positive Reviews

34

Negative Reviews

Summary

The Intel Core i9-9980XE is a Skylake-X HEDT processor that Reddit treats as a cautionary tale in Intel's lineup — an 18-core chip that launched at $2,000 and consistently lost the value argument to AMD Threadripper. Sentiment is mostly negative, with users pointing to its extreme price, lack of ECC support, and security vulnerability mitigations that actually made its successor perform worse. It finds a niche in workloads requiring AVX-512 and quad-channel memory bandwidth, and second-hand units have become more reasonable as the market moved on to Sapphire Rapids HEDT. Most Redditors view it as a product that only made sense if Intel gave it to you for free.

Pros

  • 18 cores and 36 threads with AVX-512 support — useful for inference workloads, scientific computing, and heavy multithreaded tasks that specifically benefit from AVX-512
  • Quad-channel DDR4 memory with up to 128GB capacity gives it an edge in memory-bandwidth-heavy applications like video editing and large dataset processing
  • 44 PCIe 3.0 lanes enable multi-GPU and multi-NVMe setups without bandwidth bottlenecks, making it viable for complex workstation builds
  • Overclocking headroom exists — users report stable clocks around 4.5–4.6GHz with adequate cooling, though it requires custom loop setups
  • Mesh interconnect architecture (essentially a 'baby Xeon') means it handles high core-count workloads more gracefully than mainstream consumer chips
  • Second-hand pricing has dropped significantly as users upgrade to Sapphire Rapids HEDT, making it accessible for budget workstation or homelab builds

Cons

  • No ECC memory support despite a $2,000 launch price — a glaring omission that competitors like AMD Threadripper 2950X included at a lower price point
  • Security vulnerability mitigations (Spectre, Meltdown, MDS) degraded real-world performance noticeably, and hardware fixes in the successor chip (10980XE) introduced their own performance penalties
  • Value proposition demolished by AMD — the Ryzen 9 3900X matched or exceeded it in most workloads at a fraction of the cost, and Threadripper 3000 series made it irrelevant for HEDT use cases
  • Overclocking ceiling is relatively low — hitting 4.5GHz all-core requires aggressive cooling and the chip doesn't scale nearly as well as older Skylake-X parts under extreme cooling
  • High TDP and power draw make it expensive to run long-term, and thermal management requires a 360mm AIO at minimum for sustained workloads
  • Still expensive on the used market for what it offers — some listings exceed €800, which is hard to justify when Zen 4 Threadripper and Sapphire Rapids HEDT exist

The AVX-512 Tax: Who Actually Needs This Chip?

Reddit's consensus is clear: unless your workload specifically demands AVX-512 and quad-channel memory, the 9980XE is hard to justify. Users building ML inference rigs and scientific compute nodes keep finding reasons to pick it up second-hand, but general-purpose buyers are almost universally redirected elsewhere.

A $2,000 CPU With No ECC Support

Redditors repeatedly called out one of the 9980XE's most baffling omissions — no ECC memory support, despite costing twice what AMD's Threadripper offered with ECC included. The chip carries Xeon-level pricing with consumer-grade memory reliability, a trade-off that frustrated even Intel loyalists.

Security Patches Broke Its Own Successor

One of the more discussed quirks in these threads: the 10980XE, designed to fix the 9980XE's security vulnerabilities in hardware, ended up performing worse in multithreaded workloads because of those very mitigations. This made the 9980XE the higher-performing chip by accident — a strange legacy for a product Reddit already considered a misstep.

User Reviews (41 of 178 analyzed)

146
0
ChronoBodir/intel23d agonegative

Hardware fixes in-silicon for security flaws on intel cpus. The fixes that are in the 10980XE impacts HT to a degree, making its multithreading slightly worse than the previous 9980XE. Also, 10980XE is really a refreshed variant of the same 7980XE sold from 2 years ago with extra new instructions and hardware fixes to protect against its security flaws.

View Original Comment
104
0
graduatedprawnr/intel23d agonegative

In other words, if you want a HEDT chip for HEDT purposes, the 9980XE doesnt make sense...the Threadripper is the better proposition by any metric.

View Original Comment
91
0
tetchipr/Amd23d agonegative

Because Intel do not consider this 2000 USD CPU a workstation CPU. For reasons. It'd carry the Xeon branding if they did. ...what? Don't look at me. I don't come up with this shit.

View Original Comment
71
0
Hometerfr/intel23d agonegative

Sad part is apparently the hardware patches to remedy the security holes don't even fix them all and the platform is still insecure...really annoying at this point.

View Original Comment
65
0
Sharkdog_r/Amd23d agonegative

I was gonna say 'good thing the 2950X supports ECC then' but you were talking about the 9980XE. I had to double check on ark.intel cause i couldn't believe a $2000 workstation cpu doesn't support ECC.

View Original Comment
51
0
PeteRawr/intel23d agonegative

Sort of. Intel needs to drop their pricing. It also looks like the 9980 is just a soldered TIM version of the 7980 with a different voltage curve according to Linus' review.

View Original Comment
49
0
Atanvarno94r/intel23d agonegative

Mitigations. In our personal tests we found that with all the mitigations available the i9-9900K performed in general under the 3800X. This was more and more present in productivity bench, from the simple Cinebench to Vray, Blender, Luxmark and so on.

View Original Comment
47
0
Belzelgar/intel23d agonegative

Jesus Intel, fix your prices...

View Original Comment
37
0
andrew_joyr/Amd23d agonegative

You expected ECC support on a 2000 USD CPU.... Crazyness. You have to pay at least 10k for ECC. Meanwhile a 1500x supports ECC just fine.

View Original Comment
30
0
Liatin11r/Amd23d agonegative

Does it make sense when the 3950x will run for $750?

View Original Comment
26
0
T1beriur/Amd23d agopositive

If you need the 64 PCIe lanes and quad-channel, then of course.

View Original Comment
25
0
FortuitousAdroitr/Amd23d agonegative

Reasons to consider Intel Core i9-9980XE: None. Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: 8% higher single threaded performance, 6% higher multi threaded performance, 40 watts lower power draw, around 7% higher average synthetic performance.

View Original Comment
25
0
MonkeyPuzzlesr/Amd23d agonegative

32 core TR3 is going to be around this price point too, will make absolute mincemeat of the Skylake.

View Original Comment
19
0
Jarnisr/intel23d agonegative

From the department of #nopoors. Pointless release, overpriced.

View Original Comment
18
0
dudly99r/intel23d agonegative

It's not a single factor, Intel's currently shut down 2.5 of 3 of their best fabs, they are having shortages which could effect binning and this is on-top of the fact it's an ancient architecture on an old node, is it really that surprising it's not a good cpu?

View Original Comment
16
0
bizuder/Amd23d agonegative

Neither CPU makes sense at this moment. Skylake-X is about to be replaced with Cascade Lake, which allegedly offers up to 2.1x performance per dollar.

View Original Comment
14
0
Sofaboy90r/intel23d agonegative

We do agree that intel likes to price things highly but i think in this case they cant be competitive because threadripper is just so much cheaper to produce than this is.

View Original Comment
13
0
Osbiosr/Amd23d agonegative

Rome with 24 cores already is faster then 32 core TR2. And it has none of the numa issues!

View Original Comment
12
0
CleverBulletr/intel23d agonegative

Can you really say a year of R&D went into it?

View Original Comment
9
0
St0nks69420r/intel23d agonegative

Might be worth looking at sapphire rapids HEDT.

View Original Comment
8
0
_Oberon_r/Amd23d agonegative

The biggest reason is the overclocking capability of the 9980xe. Then again it's fucking 2000$ and you need custom loop cooling for another 600$ and a 500$ motherboard to actually overclock it to 4.6Ghz so there's that. Nice job Intel.

View Original Comment
5
0
peterfunr/intel23d agonegative

Gamers Nexus basically recommended the 7980XE over the 9980XE. Overall the 9980XE is a shitshow. Can't clock over 4.5/4.6Ghz where the 7980XE can hit 5Ghz/5.5Ghz with DIce.

View Original Comment
5
0
dstantonr/Amd23d agonegative

9980xe only has 44 lanes, and they are 3.0. Meanwhile 3950x has 24 lanes of 4.0, which is equivalent to 10% greater pci bandwidth. So you're paying triple for quad channel and a bunch of extra power use/heat.

View Original Comment
5
0
jayjr1105r/Amd23d agonegative

7nm TR is going to bend this thing over and at half the cost.

View Original Comment
4
0
DinosaurAlertr/Amd23d agonegative

For me, I'm less excited about getting 9980XE performance for the 3900x system price, but how much performance there WILL be in a 7nm Threadripper system at the 9980XE price.

View Original Comment
4
0
Musk-Order66r/intel23d agopositive

My hope is for the most possible PCIe lanes and that juicy, juicy quad+ channel memory.

View Original Comment
4
0
foonatir/homelab23d agonegative

For virtualization and given your possible memory upgrade down the line, I'd agree and go for the Xeon.

View Original Comment
4
0
Spirit117r/intel23d agonegative

Why not a 10980xe? It's basically the same thing but newer and a little better.

View Original Comment
3
0
liason_1r/intel23d agonegative

The only advantage they have is miniscule performance gains (at much higher prices) and brand loyalty.

View Original Comment
3
0
Pewzorr/intel23d agonegative

No matter what the white knights want you to believe — security holes don't matter and don't really hurt performance when fixed. They were wrong.

View Original Comment
2
0
saratoga3r/intel23d agonegative

Sapphire rapids is the best option, although to be honest unless she's doing some very specific work you probably only care about the GPU.

View Original Comment
2
0
CockInhalingWizardr/Amd23d agopositive

When overclocked the 9980xe is faster.

View Original Comment
2
0
hackenclawr/intel23d agonegative

Also worst binned chips. 10980XE is a higher volume parts @ $999. 9980XE is selling at $1999, means Intel can get higher quality leaky chips for 9980XE at very limited volume.

View Original Comment
2
0
ikes9711r/Amd23d agonegative

Even with direct die water cooling that chip gets insanely hot.

View Original Comment
1
0
Net-Runnerr/homelab23d agopositive

Depends on the actual workload. If your applications inside VMs require more frequency per core, I will go with i9, and ECC is not that critical. If it is generic virtualization, go with Xeon.

View Original Comment
1
0
ChiefDZPr/homelab23d agopositive

I'd actually run the i9 - it supports intel optane drives, although they are not being developed further they are excellent for lab boxes due to their speed, low latency and depth. VMs run well on those.

View Original Comment
1
0
BoMalarkeyr/intel23d agonegative

The cache on 9980XE is Mesh, you probably won't be able to push more than 30 or 32x on Mesh Cache.

View Original Comment
1
0
TechDinosaur2714r/Amd23d agonegative

The 9980XE is not meant to compete with AMD. It's a SKU for OEM vendors that allows them to justify shutting AMD out of their PC line up, in order to stay in Intel's good books and get their share of 14nm Xeon CPUs.

View Original Comment
1
0
SuperSaqerr/intel23d agopositive

But that's not the case? On Linux at least, the 10980XE performs a bit better than the 9980XE in multi-threaded workloads, and quite a bit better in lightly threaded workloads. And it overclocks easier.

View Original Comment
1
0
Automatic_Buffalo_14r/questions23d agonegative

It is expensive because there is still a high demand for it. For gaming, a better option than the Intel Core i9-9980XE from the same generation would be a standard Intel Core i9-9900K, as it offers similar gaming performance at a significantly lower price point.

View Original Comment
0
0
Remesarr/intel23d agopositive

What cache speeds are you seeing? The 9980XE is actually a baby Xeon. Your LLC does not need to be running at high frequency unless you're doing heavy lifting.

View Original Comment