Amd AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPUs

Amd

AMD Radeon RX 5700: What Real Users Say After Years of Use

Mar 2026

Last Analyzed

6/10

Overall Rating

29

Positive Reviews

13

Negative Reviews

Summary

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range RDNA 1 GPU that earned a solid reputation for price-to-performance at 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming. Reddit sentiment is generally positive for users who picked it up at a low price, with many still running it years later with no major issues. The card's main weaknesses are its notorious blower-style reference cooler and the fact that it lacks hardware mesh shader support, which has started to matter in a handful of newer titles. It's no longer in production — AMD discontinued the non-XT model before the XT — but used units still circulate and owners report it handles most everyday gaming well. The consensus is that at today's used prices around $100–$150, it's a reasonable stopgap, but spending slightly more to land a 6600 XT or 6700 XT is the smarter long-term play.

Pros

  • Still handles 1080p gaming well in the majority of titles, including demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 at 60–80 fps on high settings with FSR assistance
  • Can be flashed with the 5700 XT BIOS to unlock performance within 5% of the XT model, giving users an effective free upgrade with the right aftermarket cooler
  • RDNA 1 architecture delivers strong performance-per-watt for its generation, particularly compared to Nvidia's Turing cards built on older 12nm process
  • Aftermarket AIB versions like the Sapphire Pulse and MSI Gaming X run cool and quiet, with users reporting stable daily operation for 5–6+ years
  • 8GB VRAM is still adequate for most 1080p and light 1440p workloads in current titles
  • Competitive used pricing around $100–$150 makes it a viable stopgap while saving for a more modern GPU

Cons

  • No hardware mesh shader support means it cannot run certain newer titles at all — Indiana Jones (requires RT) is one example, and more games are expected to follow this trend
  • FSR 4 support is limited to RDNA 3+ (RX 9000 series), leaving 5700 users stuck on older upscaling methods with noticeably lower quality
  • Reference blower cooler was widely panned as one of the worst stock coolers reviewers had seen — loud, hot, and throttling under sustained load
  • At $150 used, alternatives like the RX 6600 XT or Intel Arc B580 offer longer driver support, mesh shader support, and better future-proofing for a similar or slightly higher price
  • Overclocking is artificially capped on the non-XT model at the driver level, limiting enthusiast tuning potential compared to the XT
  • Struggles at native 1440p in demanding modern titles — Silent Hill 2, UE5 games, and newer AAA releases require significant settings compromises or FSR to stay playable

Five Years In and Still Gaming — With Caveats

Owners who picked up aftermarket versions of the 5700 consistently report smooth daily use years later, but the growing list of games that outright refuse to run on RDNA 1 hardware is becoming harder to ignore.

The $100 Used Card That Almost Makes Sense

At rock-bottom used prices the 5700 is hard to dismiss for budget builders, but Reddit's consensus is clear: spend an extra $50–80 to land a 6600 XT or B580 and you get mesh shaders, better upscaling support, and a longer useful life.

Flash It and Forget It

A surprisingly popular Reddit trick involves flashing the non-XT with the 5700 XT BIOS, effectively closing most of the performance gap for free — a quirk that made the plain 5700 arguably the better buy at launch for users willing to tinker.

User Reviews (42 of 256 analyzed)

317
0
Firefox72r/Amd21d agopositive

Meanwhile Polaris is still chuging along and being made 4 years later.

View Original Comment
278
0
the9thduder/Amd21d agopositive

I really wish we could distinguish 'end of manufacturing' against 'end of life.' It seems pretty straightforward to me: EOM = End of Manufacturing = No more product being produced. EOL = End of Life = No more support being provided by the company (i.e. driver updates)

View Original Comment
165
0
madn3ss795r/Amd21d agopositive

Tldr: good performance per dollar and performance per watt; the reference cooler is shit

View Original Comment
90
0
Kuivamaar/Amd21d agopositive

We can distinguish and we do distinguish as a rule of thumb. The article above is just trash. Same thing happened with the Radeon VII which still is not EOL. Just discontinued.

View Original Comment
57
0
WaywardWesr/Amd21d agopositive

The 580 is such a champion of value. I bought one used in April 2019 and just sold it for $10 more.

View Original Comment
39
0
abrakadaver07r/Amd21d agopositive

Funny how the tides turned. People were disappointed with the 5700s when they were announced but hyped for Zen 2. Now with reviews out there's some disappointment regarding Ryzen's clocks (despite great performance) but a nice surprise with the GPUs.

View Original Comment
34
0
20150614r/Amd21d agonegative

It's only the 5700, the 5700XT is still being produced according to the site they quote. It has been obvious for a while if you have been following the prices. That's only for custom models, the reference cards were already EOL.

View Original Comment
33
0
Doulor76r/Amd21d agopositive

The 5700 is a great card. I would wait for a custom 5700xt if you have a good case.

View Original Comment
27
0
TheYetiCaptain1993r/Amd21d agonegative

Yeah, Gamers Nexus called it the worst stock cooler they have ever seen. Thermals and acoustics are dreadful. Even with all of that, they still called it a decent card, but recommended waiting for AiB cards.

View Original Comment
27
0
Rift_Xuperr/Amd21d agopositive

on other hand, They're super confident of RDNA2.

View Original Comment
17
0
Gammarevivedr/radeon21d agonegative

An RX 6650XT would be better. Longer driver support and more features.

View Original Comment
13
0
imbetter911r/Amd21d agonegative

Really disappointed in AMD though that the 5700 has artifically-capped maximum clocks to prevent OC-ing them to the levels of the 5700 XT. Not that the stock cooler can even handle that, but it's a bit disappointing. Hopefully with AIB aftermarket coolers and tuning, these cards can be a smash hit.

View Original Comment
12
0
MiserablePiano5211r/pcmasterrace21d agonegative

For $150 you'll probably be stuck looking for used cards

View Original Comment
11
0
Cohibaluxer/Amd21d agopositive

Nothing. They just aren't making any more so as the supply dwindles it'll be harder to buy a new one. You already have one so it means nothing to you.

View Original Comment
10
0
CrystalRamr/Amd21d agopositive

I was thinking about upgrading to the 3800X from my 2400G, but instead I'm thinking that I might just save up and buy a 5700 XT (which I was FULLY expecting to be disappointed by) since it seems to be a perfect card for 1440p60.

View Original Comment
9
0
skoomd1r/radeon21d agopositive

It's still decent for 1080p games. Definitely an upgrade from an rx 580! Undervolt that shit, turn up the power limit, overclock the memory, and it'll give you a nice little boost as well.

View Original Comment
8
0
Maltahlgamingr/Amd21d agopositive

Very misleading title. They just stopped producing the cards if the rumor is true. Drivers will still be done for card for a foreseeable future.

View Original Comment
5
0
PercentageMindless86r/radeon21d agonegative

Just save up the extra $50-100 and get a 6700xt or 6750xt

View Original Comment
4
0
Mxhall756r/radeon21d agopositive

My R5 3600 x 5700XT setup from 2019 still plays everything high 1440 100-140fps no problem. Will play ultra if you're willing to drop to 60-70fps. I do keep everything overclocked and my cpu is liquid cooled though. Been my daily for 6 years and never skipped a beat.

View Original Comment
4
0
Ok-Grab-4018r/radeon21d agopositive

Its still a decent card. Should keep you covered until you find a better gpu in a future.

View Original Comment
3
0
RagingTaco334r/radeon21d agopositive

It's great for 1080p. Also, pro tip: you can flash the VBIOS of the 5700 XT to the non-XT and get the same performance as the XT for free.

View Original Comment
3
0
kggrmr/buildapc21d agopositive

Yes, the Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 GPU is the best option for under $370 today. I would agree with that, the problem is that they are in such short supply that they are hard to find.

View Original Comment
3
0
shn6r/radeon21d agopositive

The card is pretty good still and can play all those games you mentioned....but $200 used seems pretty high. I can find used 6700 XT for that price, but this of course depends on avaibility on your region.

View Original Comment
3
0
madn3ss795_ocr/Amd21d agopositive

Using a 5700 with good cooling (like MSI Gaming X) you can use MorePowerTool to increase power/clock limit or Flash 5700XT's BIOS to get within 5% performance of a 5700XT.

View Original Comment
3
0
asc3por/Amd21d agonegative

People only wanted the 5700 so they could flash it to the XT. The stock performance difference between the 5600XT and plain 5700 was too small to for AMD because they made less money on the the 5700 than either of the XT's bracketing it. This makes sense from AMD's perspective, and it isn't like supply of the 5700 has been plentiful since the 5600XT launch anyway (probably on purpose).

View Original Comment
3
0
ElCasino1977r/Amd21d agopositive

Mine has served me well, can't wait for the next 6000 series!

View Original Comment
2
0
relevant_pet_bugr/buildapc21d agopositive

Best is always debatable, but yes, the Sapphire Pulse 5700 8GB is an excellent video card at a great price to performance ratio. Especially if you are aiming for 1080p 144mhz at 144 fps even 1440 144mhz gaming, likely with some settings adjustments.

View Original Comment
2
0
Orelha1r/Amd21d agonegative

Man, that hardware unboxed video. I don't think I've seen a blower as bad as that.

View Original Comment
1
0
timmmay82r/radeon21d agonegative

Good card if you can land one for $100. Any more than that I'd just jump on an Intel B580 for $250 if you are lucky enough to ever find one in stock. It's far more future proof.

View Original Comment
1
0
Sapphire_Edr/Amd21d agopositive

A 5700 is a solid 1440 gaming card and a really good value. I would personally save the money and get a Pulse 5700 but then again I am a little bias. As for the XT, it is a solid card, I use a Pulse 5700XT on my personal rig. As for if it is worth the cost, I have not found a game I cannot play have have a similar experience when using the 5700 or the 5700XT. The XT will throw higher frame rates, but you will not be unhappy with the 5700 instead if budget is an issue.

View Original Comment
1
0
ludespeednyr/Amd21d agopositive

I'd vote 5700 and flash to xt. I have a reference 5700 and flashed to xt speeds. No increase in noise etc. Eventually I'll mess with undervolting. Oh and I run 1440p 75hz 10-bit. No issues.

View Original Comment
1
0
letthebandplayr/Amd21d agopositive

You need to tweak it obviously, undervolt, fan curve...etc. My reference 5700 in my SO's computer tweaked to XT specifications is in striking distance of my XT in my computer with the same temperatures. Get the 5700.

View Original Comment
1
0
H1TMANzar/Amd21d agonegative

when will AMD move away from the bloody reference blower style cooler ffs, now we must pay a premium for a better cooler...

View Original Comment
1
0
TigerMeltzr/Amd21d agopositive

The 5700 cards beat Vega 56 and 64 handily in almost every benchmark I have seen thus far. The XT even is close or beating the Vega VII. If you purchased an RTX 2070, especially an RTX 2060, or a Vega VII recently, I feel bad for you guys. I don't think anyone expected the prices and performance from Navi to actually be good.

View Original Comment
1
0
IndependentSeaweed96r/radeon21d agopositive

It is fine/still good for 1080p & probably above with fsr. Got one as a stop gap and it plays CP2077 high 60-80fps native, 120+ FPS with fsr 2.1. Black ops 6: 60-80 FPS native ultra/extreme settings, 125fps with fsr quality. Battlefield 2042: 110-120 FPS medium high settings.

View Original Comment
1
0
Norion33r/radeon21d agonegative

With an increasing number of games not supporting this GPU all I gotta say is ouch.

View Original Comment
1
0
Innuendo64_r/pcmasterrace21d agonegative

Intel Arc A380 is essentially your only new option. You might find a used 3060 or 2070 for under $150. If you save up another $100, that gets you into the range of a Arc B580 or RTX 5050, or used 3070/4060. BG3 is doable with any of those.

View Original Comment
1
0
Cacodemon85r/Amd21d agopositive

Now I'm wondering, how much performance increase we can expect from the higher end AIB models?? 5/8% above the stock blower versions??

View Original Comment
1
0
Annual-Queasyr/radeon21d agopositive

It also has dual bios, so you can tune it to run almost like a Rx 5700 xt model.

View Original Comment
1
0
bubblesort33_2r/radeon21d agopositive

It's not much worse than an RX 6600. So depends what you paid for it. At 1080p you'll still match PS5 settings.

View Original Comment
0
0
bubblesort33r/radeon21d agonegative

Doesn't support mesh shaders. Can't play Indiana Jones because that requires ray tracing. Future games will be more like this. Soon driver updates could be abandoned. It likely won't even run FSR4 properly. See what an rx 6600 or 6600xt/6650xt costs instead.

View Original Comment
0
0
Mythicguyr/radeon21d agopositive

Depends on what you're playing. CoD, fortnite or any older AAA game? absolutely. Any modern game that runs UE5, you'll be struggling at 1080p. Not an unusable card by any means though.

View Original Comment