LG QNED92A Reddit Verdict: Good LCD, Awkward Market Fit

What a weird comparison. The LG isn't even better than QN90D or Bravia 7. This isn't even a choice

I wouldn't recommend LG glossy panels for this room, they are very reflective. I would suggest mini-LEDs like the Sony Bravia 7.

LG QNED is just not worth your money.

The Bravia 9 is double the peak brightness, and has almost triple the amount of dimming zones. The QNED92 is a good LED TV when compared to past LG LEDs but if you pit it against the Samsung QN90F or the Sony Bravia 7 it falls short in performance.

This subreddit is way too invested in RTINGS reviews and their own echo chamber. It doesn't perfectly paint the picture for real life viewing.

LG makes good OLEDs. LG LEDs are hot garbage. Sony all the way.

Bravia 9 is the best non-OLED TV on the market.

Bravia 9 obviously lol, by a long shot

Is it better than a Bravia 5? No, a Bravia 5 will have better upscaling, processing, and motion handling. But for kids watching TV and guests, save the money and get the LG — it's still decent.

Bravia 9 — best mini LED available. Look up the specs!

Honestly, the Bravia 9 is just a much better buy overall, as long as you're cool with spending a bit more money. The extra cost is worth it for what you get.

Bravia 9 best mini led tv, qned 92A is not even close.

It's a full array 120 hz mini LED with Dolby vision. Pretty decent specs for a tv. TCL you'll still get a slightly better picture and probably a better price. But LG uses really good processors and TCL I still see some QC issues going on as far as motion handling and what not.

It's because traditionally LG wasn't good when it came to their LED models. They have improved over the last few years, but the QNED92A is their only LED worth even considering because the QNED85A is an edge lit LED being marked as a MiniLED. However, since they make great OLEDs... reviewers tend to overlook LG's LEDs or give them a free pass since what gets the clicks on their review is OLED.

QM7K for more vibrant and brighter picture and QNED92A for better upscaling. Depends on what you watch. TCL would be better for movies and LG would be better for sports and low resolution upscaling.

For the US the LG is far more expensive than TCL. If it's the same price then you might as well get the LG.

Yes the QNED92A is FALD.

People scream that OLED is better than everything but it's such an oversimplification and really depends on how you plan to use the tv. If the tv is going in a dark room, get the B5, no question. If you're in a brighter room and you can afford it, get the C5. If you personally prefer having a very bright picture, are someone who would obsess over OLED burn in, or just don't want to spend that much, get the QNED.

Is the 85" not negotiable? You can get a 77" OLED at a similar price and miles better quality of a TV.

In most cases, the QNED92A is a worse option than similarly priced or even cheaper miniLED displays. As others mentioned, the QM7K has better picture overall whilst being usually cheaper. In any case, if the QNED92A is cheaper or on a heavy discount, it's worth considering.

I brought LG and is superior to Samsung and TCL at blacks level and local dimming. I tested all 3, and LG is far better!

At my place it is priced in the same range or even below TCL. Why will I not go for LG with far better motion handling.

The QM7K also beats LG on pretty much everything except maybe motion handling and upscaling but the price can be as much as $300 cheaper for the TCL. Right now they are the same price so it's a toss up, but go back a few months ago and LG was overpriced as hell vs the QM7K.

Thanks, purchased it offline today.

Quality difference to a QNED is extreme to be honest. I own both.

Between the OLED and 92A, the 92A is going to provide a bit more brightness. G5 would be the best OLED bet, but something like the Bravia 7 could work too.

If you don't wanna spend that much and QNED is still an option, the 92a over the 85a for sure.

The QNED also has an improved amount of local dimming zones this year. It is also a VA panel at smaller sizes which might be a little too colorful and punchy for most eyes.

I'm a huge TCL fan and have been for a long time. Perhaps I got a bad panel, but the LG smokes it in terms of interface lag and black conformity. Is the TCL brighter? Yes. But that's about all I can say.

The LG is brighter for a bright room. The Sony overall will have better processing and light control for better contrast. But from what you are saying about how they would be used, I think either would work well — just depends on what operating system you like and picture you prefer.

I can personally assure you that a slightly smaller, higher quality TV is MUCH better than a larger but worse TV.

Never buy LG LED TV.

In LG I prefer OLEDs only or the old ones like UR75.

I purchased it in October 2025, and within a day I noticed some dark spots on the panel. I raised a complaint, and after multiple inspections, the TV was replaced after one month. Since then, it has been working fine. The replacement unit is also a July-manufactured model.

B9 any day. QNEDs are not even close.

OLEDs good but if you're not going for OLED I would say go with TCL mini LED instead of QNEDs or anything else.

At the same price the Bravia 5 is better. The Bravia 7 is about $700 more right now, but look at that over the five plus years this is going to be on your wall. Color, brightness, and contrast — the B7 destroys anything short of the B9.

Go for the size. Bravia 5 85" is a fantastic TV. You can also look at the TCLs to save a bit.

If the majority of your watching is during the day then the TCL is a good alternative, even better than Samsung. Quality is not even close to the C5 but for brightness and day viewing the TCL wins.

Sure, that's why nobody is reviewing LG, because TCL exists. There is literally no post here where you don't show up mentioning TCL.

I game on my LG C4 42 inch tv/monitor and prefer Google TV over LG OS. So the real option for me would be Sony vs TCL.