Light Bleed That Won't Quit
Multiple Q60D buyers report identical backlight bleed in the same corner spots — and exchanges don't fix it. Reddit's verdict: it's a design limitation of edge-lit panels, not a unit defect.

Samsung
Last Analyzed
Overall Rating
Positive Reviews
Negative Reviews
The Samsung Q60D is Samsung's entry-level QLED TV, and Reddit makes no effort to hide that fact. Community consensus across multiple threads is that this is a disappointing performer for the price — users routinely note it's barely distinguishable from Samsung's own Crystal UHD budget lineup, and subreddits dedicated to TV advice have gone so far as to pin automated warnings urging buyers to avoid it entirely. That said, at steep discounts (sub-$400 range), a small minority find it acceptable for casual, non-critical viewing. It's a TV that exists primarily for Samsung brand loyalists who don't know there are better options at the same price.
Multiple Q60D buyers report identical backlight bleed in the same corner spots — and exchanges don't fix it. Reddit's verdict: it's a design limitation of edge-lit panels, not a unit defect.
At full retail, the Q60D is nearly impossible to justify. The TCL QM7 and even Hisense U6N offer Mini-LED backlighting, higher refresh rates, and Dolby Vision for comparable or lower prices.
Multiple users report being steered toward the Q60D in-store, only to discover after consulting Reddit that sales staff were likely incentivized to push Samsung. The sub's pinned warning bot fires on almost every Q60D thread.
Q60D is a low end TV, so it's not surprising that it would look similar to another low end Samsung TV.
View Original CommentIt is pretty much the worst possible/most entry level QLED you can get so I'm not surprised you aren't noticing much of a difference unless you were really comparing some kinds of colorful HDR content.
View Original CommentThe Q60D is a poop turd of a tv. Entry level QLED barely a step up from the Crystal series. Should return that hunk of junk if they still can.
View Original CommentSamsung not having Dolby Vision is an absolute deal breaker for me so I cannot purchase their TVs.
View Original CommentIt's not a good tv no matter the price. 65" for that budget is an unrealistic ask.
View Original CommentLook at the QM7 55" from TCL for $480 and don't look back. It's as good as it'll get for the budget you're around.
View Original CommentGet the QM7 at $700 — way better TV. You get mini LED plus 120Hz and Dolby Vision at Best Buy. If it's only Target, go with OLED; Target has no other good TVs.
View Original CommentBravia 7 first, then Samsung QN85D/Sony X90L, then at 50th place Samsung Q60D — do not buy if you're considering any of the three above.
View Original CommentThere are amazing QLEDs and not amazing QLEDs.
View Original CommentDamn, everyone in here ripping on that TV like it owes them money.
View Original CommentThe Q60D is hardly different from the Crystal. QN85 is where you start to get anything decent but it's overpriced compared to a QM8.
View Original CommentYou don't have to spend quite $1000 on a 65" TV as the TCL QM7 for $697 is a really good TV for its price, so that's the minimum I would get.
View Original CommentThe problem with Samsung TVs is that there is always a better option at every price range from brands like LG/Sony/TCL.
View Original CommentBright room → Mini-LED. Dark room → OLED.
View Original CommentSamsung uses some odd OS (Tizen). Sony uses Google TV which IMO will become the standard. I run apps like Kodi, Stremio, and Tivimate natively on my X90L, no need for a Firestick, Apple TV or Roku.
View Original CommentSamsung must be giving them incentives, because Sony is the superior TV in pretty much every segment — unless you like the boosted neon Samsung colors.
View Original CommentI don't know how I would call it really bad. It's an entry-level TV that performs well at an entry level price. Personally I've been loving mine and been quite impressed with it for an entry level television. Of course it's not a premium top of the tier TV but it leaves a lot to be happy with.
View Original CommentIt's the same TV as the QE1D. It's not a good TV by any measure. If size is the only thing you care about, it will fulfill that, but it's much worse than your Q80T.
View Original CommentSame issue on my 85". Read in another thread others are having issues as well. Samsung needs to figure this out ASAP.
View Original CommentSamsung. No, skip it even if it's free.
View Original CommentAmong the choices mentioned, Bravia 7 is top notch, then X90L, followed by QN85D, and lastly Q60D.
View Original CommentI went with this sub's recommendation of the Sony models and got a 65" X90L open box on sale at Best Buy for $750. I couldn't be happier. It's a significant upgrade from what I had.
View Original CommentThe Q60D is not a good TV. Majority of Samsung is trash and has terrible QC. The higher end Samsung models (OLED) — getting a good panel from them is like hitting the lottery.
View Original CommentOLED is a whole different animal — in a good way. Most QLED TVs are edge-lit, hot garbage.
View Original CommentIn Canada I went in for an X90L or a U88N and the guy wouldn't stop pushing the Samsung Q80D, even though it was clearly worse.
View Original CommentQLED isn't the main reason you buy a specific TV. All good TVs have some sort of QLED tech, but they also have other things that make them good. Not all TVs marketed as QLED are actually good.
View Original CommentIt's edge-lit. So color accuracy won't be too great and they're prone to dying faster than expected.
View Original CommentNo, any MiniLED, even the Hisense U6N is the minimum!
View Original CommentSadly yes, around that price range, it's best to get a TCL.
View Original CommentTCL QM7 or Q7 for your budget, or if you up it go with the Sony X90L.
View Original CommentI have nothing to say about Samsung panels; they're excellent. But as far as the software goes, it's not quite there... I own a 2024 QLED purchased a year ago, and I experience lag and slight input freezes far too often for a €600 product. If you're considering a Samsung, I think you should consider the OLED or NeoQLED models.
View Original CommentI'd get a refund and save up for a QN85 or QN90.
View Original CommentI just purchased the same model this weekend and have the same backlight bleed in the same spots. We purchased from Best Buy and exchanged for another TV today. Same backlight bleed spots on this TV as well. This seems to be common for this model; there's a lot of threads asking the same question. I've read it can diminish over time.
View Original CommentAll the Q60 range is like this, that's why they are cheap. I got a refund on mine, and went with Sony mini LED. Edge-lit TVs will have this unbearable light bleed — should be illegal to sell them.
View Original CommentDon't even think to put a Q60D in the same category. It's edge-lit and way below the status quo. Q85 is ok but Samsung is just clueless with color science.
View Original CommentIf you can afford the Bravia 7, go with the Bravia 7. Otherwise X90L is still an awesome TV. None of those Samsungs are on my buy radar.
View Original CommentYou were dealing with a salesman who was offered a spiff for selling Samsung product.
View Original CommentSony vs Samsung ain't even the same sport.
View Original CommentI wouldn't go with the QN85D over a Bravia 7 or even the X90L. The Q60D is even further down that list.
View Original CommentI bought a Q70D for my kid's room. Haven't had this backlight bleed issue. That's awful to see on the Q60D.
View Original Comment